Instrumentation & Control

Analysers and sampling systems — where the real problem usually is

What an analyser measures that a transmitter cannot, why the sample system causes most of the failures, how transport lag limits what you can control, and why the take-off point decides everything.

IntermediateOil & GasPetrochemicalPharmaceutical

Standards referencedISA 76IEC 61285IEC 60079-14

Every other instrument on this site measures a physical property — pressure, temperature, flow, level. An analyser measures what the stream is made of.

That difference is why analysers behave so differently from everything else in the instrumentation section.

What they measure

Process analysers and what each measuresSource: General instrumentation practice
Gas chromatographFull composition, component by componentMinutes per cycleProduct quality, custody transfer, column controlCarrier gas supply, column ageing, long cycle time
InfraredSpecific gases — CO, CO₂, hydrocarbonsSecondsCombustion products, emissions, leak detectionCross-sensitivity to other gases present
Paramagnetic or zirconia oxygenOxygen concentrationSecondsCombustion control on fired heaters, inerting checksZirconia cells need high temperature and age steadily
pHAcidity or alkalinitySecondsEffluent neutralisation, water treatmentElectrodes foul and drift; frequent calibration needed
ConductivityDissolved ionic contentImmediateBoiler feed water, condensate contaminationTemperature compensation must be right
MoistureWater content in gas or liquidSeconds to minutesGas dehydration, dry product specificationThe sample line itself holds moisture and slows response
Density and viscosityPhysical properties used to infer compositionImmediateBlending, product gradingTemperature correction is essential
Flammable gas detectorGas in air, as a percentage of the lower explosive limitSecondsArea gas detection, building intake protectionA safety device, not a process analyser — tested on a set cycle

An ordinary transmitter measures a physical property — pressure, temperature, flow. An analyser measures what the stream is made of. That difference is why analysers need a sample taken, conditioned and delivered, and why they are the least reliable instruments on most plants.

Analysers are used where composition is what matters: product on specification, combustion efficiency, emissions compliance, custody transfer, environmental discharge, and safety detection.

They are also, on most plants, the least available instruments. Understanding why is the whole of this topic.

The analyser is rarely the problem

Why analysers fail — and it is usually not the analyserSource: General operating and maintenance experience
Sample line pluggedReading frozen, or drifting very slowlyWax, hydrate, solids or polymer in the lineHeat tracing, filtration, larger bore, fast loop
Transport lag too longAnalyser correct but always late; control huntsLong sample line at low flowA fast loop returning most of the sample to the process
Phase change in the lineErratic or nonsensical readingsSample cooling and condensing, or flashing on pressure dropTracing, insulation, and reducing pressure at the right point
Unrepresentative take-offAnalyser disagrees with the laboratory, consistentlyProbe in a dead leg, at the wall, or downstream of a mixing pointRelocating the probe — a design fix, not a maintenance one
Calibration gas exhaustedValidation fails, or drift goes uncorrectedCylinder not replaced, or regulator leakingCylinder pressure monitoring and a stocking routine
Carrier gas lostA chromatograph stops producing results entirelyCylinder empty or supply interruptedDuplicate cylinders with automatic changeover
Sample disposal blockedNo sample flow, and possibly back pressure on the analyserReturn line or vent plugged, or return pressure risenChecking the disposal route, which is often forgotten entirely

Industry experience consistently puts the large majority of analyser unavailability in the sample system rather than the instrument. The analyser is generally a sound piece of laboratory equipment being asked to work on whatever arrives down a tube from a process line.

A pressure transmitter sits on the pipe and measures it. An analyser sits in a shelter some distance away and measures a sample that has been taken, transported, conditioned and delivered to it.

Every one of those steps can go wrong, and most of them do.

The take-off point decides everything

If the sample is not representative, nothing downstream can fix it.

A probe should sit in well-mixed flowing stream — not in a dead leg, not at the pipe wall where the boundary layer differs from the bulk, not immediately downstream of a mixing point before the streams have combined, and not where liquid can collect around it.

Conditioning and lag

Between the tap and the analyser the sample usually has to be filtered, have its pressure and temperature reduced, kept in a single phase, and delivered at a controlled flow.

Two things dominate the design.

Phase. A gas sample that cools and condenses, or a liquid that flashes across a pressure reduction, is no longer the thing you meant to measure. Heat tracing, insulation, and taking the pressure drop at the right point are what prevent it.

Transport lag. Sample trickling slowly down thirty metres of small-bore tubing may take several minutes to arrive. The answer is a fast loop — a high flow kept moving through the line and returned to the process, with only a small slipstream taken off for the analyser.

That lag matters beyond patience:

Where they live

The interior of a process analyser shelter. A wall of stainless steel sample conditioning panels carries small-bore tubing, pressure regulators, rotameters and filter bowls. Two analyser cabinets stand alongside, with calibration gas cylinders secured against the wall and the plant visible through the open door.
Almost everything in this picture is sample system, not analyser. The two cabinets on the right do the measuring; the wall of tubing, regulators, rotameters and filters exists to deliver a sample they can actually read — and it is where the faults are.

Analysers are often grouped in an analyser house, which is the awkward building described in buildings and shelters: a small shelter that deliberately contains process samples, and is therefore a hazard rather than a refuge from one. Ventilated rather than sealed, gas detected, and often a classified area inside.

Field-mounted analysers avoid the sample transport problem entirely but then have to survive the weather and be maintained at the point of measurement, in whatever hazardous area classification applies.

Calibration and validation

Analysers drift, so they are checked against known reference gases or solutions.

  • Validation — passing a known sample through and confirming the reading, without changing anything.
  • Calibration — adjusting the response to match.

Both need calibration gas in date and in stock, and the routine that keeps it there. An analyser whose calibration cylinder has been empty for two months is still producing a number on the operator’s screen, and it is the sort of failure nobody notices because the display never goes blank.

What to take away

  • An analyser measures composition; everything else measures a physical property.
  • Most analyser downtime is the sample system, not the analyser.
  • If it disagrees with the lab consistently, move the probe — do not recalibrate.
  • Keep the sample in one phase. Condensing or flashing destroys the measurement.
  • Use a fast loop to cut transport lag; add cycle time to it to get the real age of the reading.
  • A slow analyser trims a faster loop in cascade rather than controlling directly.
  • An analyser with expired calibration gas still shows a number. That is what makes it dangerous.

Check your understanding

10 questions. Nothing is recorded — this is just for you.

1An analyser consistently disagrees with the laboratory result on the same stream. What should you suspect first?
2What is a fast loop for?
3A gas chromatograph has a five-minute cycle. What does that mean for using it in a control loop?
4Where does most analyser unavailability come from?
5A gas sample cools on its way to the analyser and partly condenses. What has happened to the measurement?
6Why is a slow analyser usually arranged to trim a faster loop in cascade rather than control directly?
7Why is an analyser house a hazard rather than a refuge?
8What is the difference between validating and calibrating an analyser?
9An analyser's calibration cylinder has been empty for two months. What does the operator see?
10What advantage does a field-mounted analyser have over one in an analyser house?

#instrumentation#analysers#sampling#quality#maintenance